Home › Monitor Response Time Explained

Monitor Response Time Explained: Why "1ms" Is Only Half the Story
The two numbers called "response time"
GtG (grey-to-grey) measures how long pixels take to change between shades. A panel makes thousands of different transitions; manufacturers quote the fastest one. MPRT (moving picture response time) measures perceived blur using a strobing backlight — a different test that produces flattering small numbers (ASUS quotes both 1ms GtG and 1ms MPRT on the VG34VQL3A, for two different things). Neither is a lie; neither is an average. When a listing just says "1ms" with no label, assume it is whichever number looked best.
Why the average is what you actually see
Motion clarity is set by the average transition and the slowest ones, not the record. Our research rule of thumb, confirmed across the lab reviews we check: fast IPS panels in our guides' class measure averages of a few milliseconds; VA panels are competitive on bright transitions but much slower on dark-to-dark changes, which is the smearing you see behind dark objects; OLED transitions are effectively instant at any shade, which is why a 240Hz OLED looks clearer than a 240Hz LCD at the same refresh rate. Overdrive settings complicate it further — push voltage to speed pixels up and they overshoot, leaving bright coronas (inverse ghosting). The middle overdrive preset is usually the honest one, and lab reviews test it; marketing does not mention it.
Response time vs refresh rate — the frame budget
| Refresh rate | Time per frame | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 60Hz | 16.7ms | Even a slow panel finishes inside the frame — response rarely the limit |
| 144Hz | 6.9ms | Averages above ~7ms start to smear the next frame |
| 180Hz | 5.6ms | Fast IPS territory; VA dark transitions fall behind |
| 240Hz | 4.2ms | OLED's home ground; LCD best cases only just fit |
| 360Hz+ | 2.8ms | Esports LCDs live or die by their measured averages |
A pixel that takes longer to change than the frame it belongs to is still mid-transition when the next frame arrives — that is ghosting, defined arithmetically. It is why response matters more as refresh climbs, and why our esports guide weighs measured figures over box claims.
Our picks, labelled the way we insist on
| Monitor | Box figure | What checking found |
|---|---|---|
| MSI MPG 322URX / Samsung G93SC (OLED) | 0.03ms GtG | Near-instant in practice, as with other OLEDs — the rare honest headline |
| Dell G2724D | 1ms GtG (Extreme mode) | Measured averages around 6.5ms in independent testing — still a fast monitor, honestly labelled in our guides |
| MSI G274QPF E2 | 1ms GtG | Marketed figure; fast-IPS class averages of a few ms are the realistic expectation |
| ASUS VG34VQL3A (VA) | 1ms GtG + 1ms MPRT | Two different measurements sharing a number; expect slower dark transitions, as with all VA |
| BenQ MOBIUZ EX251 | 1ms class | 220Hz esports panel — chosen for refresh and size; response is fast-IPS class |
How to read any monitor listing after this page
Ask three questions. Which measurement — GtG or MPRT? Best case or average — if no average is published by a lab, treat the number as decoration. At what overdrive — and does the review show overshoot at that setting? Our methodology page sets out how we apply the same three questions to every pick before it is published, and our guides print the answer next to each monitor rather than hiding it in a footnote.
Update history
November 10, 2026: Published: GtG vs MPRT, overdrive, and marketed vs measured response figures for our picks.
